I like it.
The trousers, which seem to be a matter of odd fixation amongst fans
at the moment, probably look a lot less shapeless in motion. I like
the suspenders, classic Doctor apparel there. I like the fact that
there's a rainbow but not an actual, legit pride rainbow so you can't
prove nothin' in your rambling letters of complaint, conservatives
who suddenly care about this show for some reason. Its a fashion
disaster, I am told, and to my mind that makes it perfect. Just
because the Doctor is now a woman they should not have suddenly
regenerated with the ability dress themselves.
That doesn't
seem like enough for a post, does it?
Okay then
I'll defend the piercings to make myself feel like I'm not just
writing filler because its Friday evening right now and I am full of cake.
You see, the
best worst take I have read about this costume so far come from those
who are fixated with the fact Whittaker has piercings in her ears.
Some have even (obviously but still depressingly) claimed that this
Doctor having pierced ears when no other Doctor has pierced ears
proves they are fundamentally changing the character beyond all
recognition and therefore the Doctor should only ever be played by a
man.
Yeah, okay,
fake nerd boys, listen up!
For a start,
we don't know that the Doctor wakes up from regeneration with
pre-pierced ears. For all we know she could pop out to get her ears
pierced during whatever costume choosing montage creates this
glorious fashion disaster. Second, and most importantly, Jon Pertwee
(who I feel we can all agree was definitely the Doctor and whose
status as such cannot be denied) woke up from regeneration with a
tattoo. We know this because we got to watch him showering in his
debut story.
So maybe
pierced ears are not the breaking point of canon.
No comments:
Post a Comment